In the News: 'Less stressful?' Maybe. 'More productive?' I don't think so.

19:59

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-surrey-27357031

According to the above article, sixth-form lessons at a private school in Surrey are now to start at 13.30, instead of 9.00.  Apparently, this is to allow the students to have a lie-in. Despite being a sixth-former myself last year, I can't help but laugh at the fact that this is actually serious.  You may beg to differ, but is it really that unreasonable to ask a young adult to be awake at 9am on a week day?  Fine, stay in bed all day at the weekend, but surely the discipline of being up and presentable along with the rest of the working world is all part of getting an education?

Here are some flaws that sprung to mind at a first glance:



  • By sleeping all morning, students will have wasted half the day.  While some may make up for this lost time by studying later at night, many will spend their evenings relaxing. I have no idea how they are expected to get all their work done if they're spending half the day in bed.  Are they meant to study through the night?  If so, they'll probably put their body-clock so out of sync that they'll be no more alert at 13.30 than they previously were at 9.00.  
  • In the same way, getting up later will probably mean going to bed later, which seems to undo any positive effect of this idea.  Even taking the "delayed-phase clock" into account, if the students are sleeping for the same number of hours as before, then they are unlikely to be much 'more productive' when they do make it into lessons.
  • Not everyone fits the 'lazy student' stereotype.  What about those who are naturally early risers?  Are they expected to lounge around all morning, or start their studying at 9 or 10am and carry on through until 19.00?  This seems very unfair and will just cause these students to become exhausted.
  • How will students continue with a jobs or any extra-curricular activities that they do?  It seems unlikely that many clubs/music groups/societies/sports practices will take place before midday or after about eight in the evening.  As well as taking away the personal and social benefits of these things, this will also give students less to put on their personal statement or CV, meaning that they are less likely to get into university or get a job.
  • The 'working day' begins at 9, or earlier.  Upon leaving school, these students will undoubtedly have some difficultly adjusting to a 9-5 job or a 9am lecture.
  • The fact that many students "did not sleep sufficiently during the week" can probably be partially blamed on staying up late watching TV and checking Facebook etc, rather than the "delayed" biological clock.  Going into school later won't change this.
I've probably come across as an 18 year-old going on 50, but I can't believe that no one else under the age of 20 would agree with me!?

I really hope that this "pioneering" move won't catch on in too many other schools, otherwise 1.30-7 may well become the new 9-5.


Harriet x

You Might Also Like

7 comments

  1. I am absolutely on your side Harriet, I have alway been an early riser and this would not work for me at all

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm glad to hear that there are other people out there who wake up early! Thanks for your comment:)

      Delete
  2. Dear 'Anonymous'. I am absolutely appalled by what you have to say. The teenage biological clock is not to meddled with and it is A SCIENTIFIC FACT that teens are prone to waking up late. Please come back to me when you have a deeper understanding of this topic.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Rosie, I appreciate your comment and I am certainly not pretending to be an expert on biological clocks. My post is simply an expression of my opinion on the article and how it would work for me. Of course, you are completely entitled to your own opinion and I'm sure many would agree with you.

      Delete
    2. Rosie, 'appalled' is, to be frank, an outlandishly strong word to use here. Teens on average get 7.5 hours sleep, where they should be getting 9.5. This could be countered by going to bed earlier (sensible option), or starting classes a couple of hours early, not the large 4.5 hour gap Harriet read about.
      Also, all teens have their own little quirks and idiosyncrasies regarding sleep, so to generalise them all is unwise.

      Delete
    3. Dear Anonymous, as a paediatric sleep therapist with a PHD in sleep disorder I can very well say that you are being OUTLANDISH here. Now can everyone here just take a deep breath and calm down.

      Delete
    4. ...sigh...

      Delete

Like us on Facebook

Flickr Images